Right from the start, we must ask ourselves what organized crime and human trafficking are? In order to answer the first question, we might look at the hundreds of definitions which have different levels of support, internationally.

If there is something that common-law scholars are in particular doubt about, those are the concepts of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. Out of simple academic curiosity, the purpose of this paper is to shed light upon the common-law scholars’ efforts of theorizing and justifying the concept of Unjust Enrichment. Due to the fact that the notion is inextricably linked to the matter of Restitution, the two concepts are always sadly and inefficiently explained through each other.

Overlooking the endless doctrine that embodies the states into the motif of the international system, I found myself in need of drawing attention upon the individuals’ status in this very framework.  Given the acute flourish of globalization, it comes as no surprise that the need for change is the one that characterizes nowadays’ international legal environment comes as no surprise.

In a world where international law revolves around states, government officials abducting a person from another state without its consent is a violation of that state’s sovereignty. However, we believe that it is legitimate for a state to take such action when done with the purpose of instituting criminal procedures against a person charged with crimes against humanity under international law.